Your message dated Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:58:15 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#130609: perlpod and podchecker disagree on requiredness of 
=back
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: perl
Version: 5.6.1-6
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/podchecker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

podchecker flags =over not having =back as an error, but perlpod says:

        you don't _have_ to include the =back if the list just runs off the
        document

Which mine did. And podchecker said it was an error.

- -- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

Versions of packages perl depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.2.4-7     GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb2                       2:2.7.7.0-2 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii  libgdbmg1                    1.7.3-27    GNU dbm database routines (runtime
ii  perl-base                    5.6.1-6     The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii  perl-modules                 5.6.1-6     Core Perl modules.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8T2Y95lsmI6uA7bQRAt4EAJ45ph+u8GoiFoM3Ix/8Bzh/LMxfGACgk4jU
oNmObjvktVg7/nGHW4PrBR0=
=Fvy1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: perl
Version: 5.8.0-7

On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 08:41:14PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Package: perl
> Version: 5.6.1-6
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/podchecker
 
> podchecker flags =over not having =back as an error, but perlpod says:
> 
>       you don't _have_ to include the =back if the list just runs off the
>       document

Hi,

this statement was removed from the perlpod documentation in 5.8.0.
Closing accordingly (with permission from the maintainer.)

Cheers,
-- 
Niko Tyni   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to