Your message dated Fri, 06 Apr 2007 12:17:04 +0000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337732: fixed in netkit-rwho 0.17-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Package: rwhod Version: 0.17-8 Severity: minor rwhod does not correctly parse the -? option. There is a case in rwhod.c that handles -? case '?': default: usage(); But it is not listed as an option a few lines before while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "bpai:fu:")) != EOF) { Also, wouldn't -h or --help be more logical in the first place? Matthijs -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages rwhod depends on: ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove users and groups ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii passwd 1:4.0.13-4 change and administer password and rwhod recommends no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: netkit-rwho Source-Version: 0.17-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of netkit-rwho, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: netkit-rwho_0.17-9.diff.gz to pool/main/n/netkit-rwho/netkit-rwho_0.17-9.diff.gz netkit-rwho_0.17-9.dsc to pool/main/n/netkit-rwho/netkit-rwho_0.17-9.dsc rwho_0.17-9_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netkit-rwho/rwho_0.17-9_i386.deb rwhod_0.17-9_i386.deb to pool/main/n/netkit-rwho/rwhod_0.17-9_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated netkit-rwho package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:03:22 +0200 Source: netkit-rwho Binary: rwhod rwho Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.17-9 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: rwho - Clients to query the rwho server rwhod - System status server Closes: 337730 337732 406093 417021 Changes: netkit-rwho (0.17-9) unstable; urgency=low . * Condition the call to userdel in postrm. (Closes: #417021) * Added support for specifying rwhod options in /etc/default/rwhod. (Closes: #406093) * Moved to debhelper compatibility 4. Created debian/compat. * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.7.2.2 * init.d script: Added LSB section * Corrected man page on -u option. (Closes: #337730) * Fixed -? option handling and added -h with the same behaviour. (Closes: #337732) Files: 0485aa150831da37a246f3cf2f7b69f7 585 net optional netkit-rwho_0.17-9.dsc da1bf7b9c0de5cc2df6c7103d389011d 11663 net optional netkit-rwho_0.17-9.diff.gz 43dbba11d54f16f86cd667e872355442 18446 net optional rwhod_0.17-9_i386.deb 50b17c7d277fc78d481035232655566c 13312 net optional rwho_0.17-9_i386.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGFjYNxRSvjkukAcMRAunzAKDyWptr3R3j4cE1V/7SPVGw2VC1TACfao0M vl9uloeMWS5vO61cXnoAbCY= =N3yc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
