Your message dated Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#271758: fixed in ud 0.7.1-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2004 01:48:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 14 18:48:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from weber.sscnet.ucla.edu [128.97.42.3] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C7OuA-0000fH-00; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:48:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by weber.sscnet.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8F1mJWT001819;
        Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from weber.sscnet.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (weber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 29048-04-3; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clitunno.sscnet.ucla.edu (trevi.sscnet.ucla.edu [128.97.185.216])
        by weber.sscnet.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8F1lHbl001524;
        Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root by clitunno.sscnet.ucla.edu with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1C7OtE-0001t4-4S; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:47:20 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ud: segfault on amd64
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:47:20 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at weber.sscnet.ucla.edu
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ud
Version: 0.7.1-16
Severity: normal


You may not want this report, as amd64 is not yet an official port of Debian. 
Still,
this is the only package I've come across that doesn't work.

When I issue "start ud" I get this every time in syslog:

ud[6277]: segfault at 000000009589ffc0 rip 0000002a956e3790 rsp 
0000007fbfffed58 error 4

Cheers,
David

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages ud depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 271758-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2005 21:52:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 10 14:52:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DKkM7-0005iw-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 14:52:36 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DKk2R-0006hA-00; Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
From: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#271758: fixed in ud 0.7.1-18
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:32:15 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: ud
Source-Version: 0.7.1-18

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ud, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ud_0.7.1-18.diff.gz
  to pool/main/u/ud/ud_0.7.1-18.diff.gz
ud_0.7.1-18.dsc
  to pool/main/u/ud/ud_0.7.1-18.dsc
ud_0.7.1-18_i386.deb
  to pool/main/u/ud/ud_0.7.1-18_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ud package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:16:52 +0000
Source: ud
Binary: ud
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.1-18
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ud         - Uptime Daemon
Closes: 271758 298738
Changes: 
 ud (0.7.1-18) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Updated to build correctly upon GNU/Hurd.
     (Closes: #298738)
   * Build issues on amd64 confirmed as closed.
     (Closes: #271758)
   * I've resisted the temptation to replace this program with a perl
     script - so far.
Files: 
 41db7abdecc1a4c43029f98f1e97b9c2 526 misc optional ud_0.7.1-18.dsc
 8c972c084097e3cbd3a94d74c82ab4d4 42116 misc optional ud_0.7.1-18.diff.gz
 a69d031ecf978c724d5b232feff3362b 25010 misc optional ud_0.7.1-18_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCWZjmwM/Gs81MDZ0RAq/wAJkBrPdZcin2Sno0EbAgHX+c8wZTGgCeNOEl
CQLs1wMZt12fgfToLgxJenY=
=d2PS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to