Your message dated Sat, 05 May 2007 17:27:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-dia-team] Bug#406929: dia: Dia escapes Latex formulas 
during pstricks export
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: dia
Version: 0.95.0-4.1+b1
Severity: normal

A textbox with "$\GlucoseUptakeFunction$"

turns into

\rput(9.100000,-5.560000){\scalebox{1 
-1}{(\$\textbackslash{}GlucoseUptakeFunction\$)}}

when exported to pstricks macros.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-xen-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages dia depends on:
ii  dia-common                0.95.0-4.1     Diagram editor (common files)
ii  dia-libs                  0.95.0-4.1+b1  Diagram editor (library files)
ii  libart-2.0-2              2.3.17-1       Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii  libatk1.0-0               1.12.4-1       The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii  libc6                     2.3.6.ds1-8    GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcairo2                 1.2.4-4        The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii  libfontconfig1            2.4.1-2        generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6              2.2.1-5        FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libglib2.0-0              2.12.4-2       The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk2.0-0               2.8.20-3       The GTK+ graphical user interface 
ii  libice6                   1:1.0.1-2      X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libpango1.0-0             1.14.8-4       Layout and rendering of internatio
ii  libpng12-0                1.2.15~beta5-1 PNG library - runtime
ii  libpopt0                  1.10-3         lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii  libsm6                    1:1.0.1-3      X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6                  2:1.0.3-4      X11 client-side library
ii  libxcursor1               1.1.7-4        X cursor management library
ii  libxext6                  1:1.0.1-2      X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfixes3                1:4.0.1-5      X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii  libxi6                    1:1.0.1-4      X11 Input extension library
ii  libxinerama1              1:1.0.1-4.1    X11 Xinerama extension library
ii  libxml2                   2.6.27.dfsg-1  GNOME XML library
ii  libxrandr2                2:1.1.0.2-5    X11 RandR extension library
ii  libxrender1               1:0.9.1-3      X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.3-13     compression library - runtime

Versions of packages dia recommends:
ii  gsfonts-x11                   0.20       Make Ghostscript fonts available t

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Daniel,

Daniel Webb wrote:
>>> On second thought, several figures in my dissertation were done using Dia
>>> where the LaTeX *was* interpreted later, so I guess the bug I'm reporting is
>>> that the behavior is inconsistent.
>> In this case, it's a real bug. Please provide an example.
> 
> Attached is a Dia file and it's corresponding postscript file after latex
> processing.  As you can see, the LaTeX code was interpreted using my macros.

I tested this with the new version 0.96.1 of dia and the behaviour was
consistent: dia takes care that the characters are printed like as you
see them in the diagram window. Both when exported to (e)ps and to
pstricks (and then processed with latex).

I'm closing this bug now since I think this is intended behaviour.

However, I created an upstream report at

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436135

for your wishlist idea. Feel free to subscribe there and stay in contact
with the (always nice and active) developers there.

Thanks for considering,

Roland

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to