Your message dated Tue, 22 May 2007 18:16:28 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425021: cp man outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: coreutils
Version: 5.97-5
The cp man page is outdated and for example the option -P is diferent,
in [1] are a correct man page.
[1]
http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_chapter/coreutils_11.html
--
ATT: Fredy P.
Coordinador FLISOL Bogotá 2007
Suerte and F.S.Fv.
_________________________________________________________________________
F.S.Fv. es acronimo de Free Software Forever
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
digitalfredy wrote:
> hello, i was review, the problem is in spanish manual
Very good. If there is a translation problem please report it to the
translator. You can find this information here.
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?domain=coreutils
Bob
> 2007/5/22, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >digitalfredy wrote:
> >> Package: coreutils
> >> Version: 5.97-5
> >>
> >> The cp man page is outdated and for example the option -P is diferent,
> >> in [1] are a correct man page.
> >> [1]
> >http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_chapter/coreutils_11.html
> >
> >Thank you for your report. But the man pages are automatically
> >generated from the program executable. This is done specifically to
> >help ensure that the man page and the program are kept in sync. It
> >would be difficult for the problem that you describe to sneak
> >through. Therefore I am suspicious that perhaps you are not using the
> >cp binary from 5.97 but are really using a later cp program version.
> >
> >Could you be more specific about the -P option behavior that you are
> >reporting? It looks okay to me.
> >
> >The documentation that you mention as being correct is for the latest
> >upstream version of coreutils which is a later version than the one
> >that you identified. You identified 5.97 but the current upstream
> >version is 6.9. That would definitely not be the right version of the
> >manual to match with version 5.97.
> >
> >Bob
> >
>
>
> --
> ATT: Fredy P.
> Coordinador FLISOL Bogotá 2007
> Suerte and F.S.Fv.
> _________________________________________________________________________
> F.S.Fv. es acronimo de Free Software Forever
>
--- End Message ---
