Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:09:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#427565: winbind: Fails to restart on 
upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: winbind
Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
Severity: important

Hi,

When upgrading samba and winbind, I always see winbind getting upgraded
before samba.  This means that winbind gets (re)started before samba.
The documentation says that winbind needs to be started after samba, so
it doesn't start properly.  After an upgrade I always need to manually
restart winbind.


Kurt



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:46:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:51:20PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: winbind
> > Version: 3.0.24-6etch1
> > Severity: important
> 
> > When upgrading samba and winbind, I always see winbind getting upgraded
> > before samba.  This means that winbind gets (re)started before samba.
> > The documentation says that winbind needs to be started after samba, so
> > it doesn't start properly.  After an upgrade I always need to manually
> > restart winbind.
> 
> When you say you /need/ to restart it, what problems does it cause if you
> don't?
> 
> winbind doesn't even depend on samba today, and I'm not aware of any reason
> it needs to, so under those circumstances restart ordering also shouldn't
> matter.

I think I'm confusing it with the other problem I'm seeing, and that
restarting both seems to give better results.

I'm guessing the only case where it's needed is in case wins is used to
resolv hostnames, which isn't the case for me.

I'm closing this.


Kurt


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to