Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:31:35 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line sg-utils filed for removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sg-utils
Version: 1.02-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my sg-utils 1.02-3.1 NMU.
diff -Nru /tmp/8MXoNZZD4S/sg-utils-1.02/debian/changelog
/tmp/5ELv7J2Dpk/sg-utils-1.02/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/8MXoNZZD4S/sg-utils-1.02/debian/changelog 2006-11-02
15:18:47.000000000 +0100
+++ /tmp/5ELv7J2Dpk/sg-utils-1.02/debian/changelog 2006-11-02
15:18:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+sg-utils (1.02-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Adapt to new syscall usage; fixes FTBFS with kernels >= 2.6.18, patch
+ from Ted Percival. (Closes: #394853)
+
+ -- Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 2 Nov 2006 15:14:00 +0100
+
sg-utils (1.02-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixes typo in postinst script (Closes: #354957)
diff -Nru /tmp/8MXoNZZD4S/sg-utils-1.02/llseek.c
/tmp/5ELv7J2Dpk/sg-utils-1.02/llseek.c
--- /tmp/8MXoNZZD4S/sg-utils-1.02/llseek.c 2000-12-09 00:50:02.000000000
+0100
+++ /tmp/5ELv7J2Dpk/sg-utils-1.02/llseek.c 2006-11-02 15:18:47.000000000
+0100
@@ -24,30 +24,21 @@
#ifdef __linux__
-#ifdef HAVE_LLSEEK
-#include <syscall.h>
-
-#else /* HAVE_LLSEEK */
-
#if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__ia64__)
#define my_llseek lseek
#else
-#include <linux/unistd.h> /* for __NR__llseek */
+#include <sys/syscall.h> /* for SYS__llseek */
-static int _llseek (unsigned int, unsigned long,
- unsigned long, llse_loff_t *, unsigned int);
+#ifdef SYS__llseek
-#ifdef __NR__llseek
-
-static _syscall5(int,_llseek,unsigned int,fd,unsigned long,offset_high,
- unsigned long, offset_low,llse_loff_t *,result,
- unsigned int, origin)
+#define _llseek(fd, offset_high, offset_low, result, origin) \
+ syscall(SYS__llseek, fd, offset_high, offset_low, result, origin)
#else
-/* no __NR__llseek on compilation machine - might give it explicitly */
+/* no SYS__llseek on compilation machine - might give it explicitly */
static int _llseek (unsigned int fd, unsigned long oh,
unsigned long ol, llse_loff_t *result,
unsigned int origin) {
@@ -71,8 +62,6 @@
#endif /* __alpha__ */
-#endif /* HAVE_LLSEEK */
-
llse_loff_t llse_llseek (unsigned int fd, llse_loff_t offset,
unsigned int origin)
{
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I've filed a bug (or rather, reassigned an existing bug) asking that
sg-utils be removed. As a consequence, I don't think there's any need
to upload a new version with this NMU (thank you for that, by the way).
If you disagree, of course, please re-open this bug.
Thanks!
-=Eric
--- End Message ---
