Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:48:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278148: fixed in rfb 0.6.1-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2004 04:39:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 24 21:39:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c-adt-5.ataco.se (bixbite.opal.dhs.org) [213.115.168.248] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CLwe9-0007qT-00; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:39:53 -0700
Received: from ola by bixbite.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CLwbD-0008R4-NK; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:36:51 +0200
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:36:51 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Christopher T King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rfb package missing dependency
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rfb
Severity: important

On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:37:55PM -0400, Christopher T King wrote:
> The rfb package in the testing distribution mentions libxclass0 as a 
> dependency, but specifically libxclass0 >= 0.8.3 is required to run it.

Thanks a lot for the report. I'll file a bugreport (to myself)
about it.

Regards,

// Ola

> Thanks,
> Chris K
> 
> 

-- 
 --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ----
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                   Annebergsslingan 37       \
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED]                    654 65 KARLSTAD           |
|  Kontor: +46 (0)54-10 14 30         Mobil: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
|  http://konsult.opal.dhs.org        UIN/icq:   4912500        |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 278148-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 19:54:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 12:54:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DNFqS-0007uH-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:54:16 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DNFlA-0006yz-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:48:48 -0400
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#278148: fixed in rfb 0.6.1-11
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 15:48:48 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rfb
Source-Version: 0.6.1-11

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rfb_0.6.1-11.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-11.diff.gz
rfb_0.6.1-11.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-11.dsc
rfb_0.6.1-11_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-11_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rfb package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 21:11:33 +0200
Source: rfb
Binary: rfb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rfb        - VNC Server for X11 - exports current display
Closes: 278148
Changes: 
 rfb (0.6.1-11) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed dependency, closes: #278148.
Files: 
 6cdbd877575ff2ba84d7f3cc6c13e5ae 622 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-11.dsc
 25e80c3a386f973059ca236bd30a9729 9343 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-11.diff.gz
 f7b2c4fb9fb1658f782a3fc838a3ee1b 243488 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-11_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCYrcHGKGxzw/lPdkRAvCWAJ99VDkRMDdYsQLxK3Bo8l7jB3+C/ACeO5sa
ZMHkK+v/IcSgAC25b4+2ubs=
=R0gL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to