Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:14:20 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430847: Please rebuild so that python-subversion bindings
with work with python-2.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-subversion
Version: 1.4.4dfsg1-1
Severity: wishlist
If you could rebuild python-subversion so that python-2.5 support could be
included, that would really be great.
Normally I just do a local rebuild of the package to work around this
situation rather than bugging the maintainer but in this case I am
having trouble getting the source package to build, so I throw the
problem back to you :)
thanks,
Bill Gribble
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to POSIX)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages python-subversion depends on:
ii libapr1 1.2.7-8.2 The Apache Portable Runtime Librar
ii libc6 2.5-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libsvn1 1.4.4dfsg1-1 Shared libraries used by Subversio
ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-support 0.6.4 automated rebuilding support for p
ii subversion 1.4.4dfsg1-1 Advanced version control system
python-subversion recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
!DSPAM:46829c40138451133974597!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
[Bill Gribble]
> If you could rebuild python-subversion so that python-2.5 support could be
> included, that would really be great.
python in unstable is still at 2.4, so rebuilding wouldn't do anything.
When python 2.5 is uploaded to unstable, we'll ask for a binNMU.
I haven't tested python-subversion against 2.5 yet, but I assume it
works without patches, because they're using it in Ubuntuland.
Closing,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
