Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:00:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 May 2004 12:09:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 29 05:09:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BU2et-0007sF-00; Sat, 29 May 2004 05:09:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id EEC622B4169
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 May 2004 14:09:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (D5E08CEF.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.140.239])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02892B4160
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 29 May 2004 14:09:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id A1DCA158AD5; Sat, 29 May 2004 14:09:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 14:09:49 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing 64bit arches.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: oo2c
Version: 1.5.9-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
There are more 64bit arches then "alpha ia64" in debian.
This is a list of the one I know of:
alpha ia64 amd64 sparc64 mips64 mipsel64 s390x powerpc64
Using the 32bit tar is really going to cause alot of problems
those arches.
Please apply the following patch:
--- debian/rules.orig 2004-05-29 11:49:32.000000000 +0000
+++ debian/rules 2004-05-29 11:56:35.980109033 +0000
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
DEB_BUILD_ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
-ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),alpha ia64))
+ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(findstring $(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),alpha ia64 amd64 sparc64
mips64 mipsel64 s390x powerpc64))
COPTFLAGS := -O1
USE_TARBALL := oo2c_64.tar.gz
else
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 251577-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2005 18:00:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 24 11:00:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zux006-049-138.adsl.green.ch (bubulina.hactrn.ch) [81.6.49.138]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DPlPc-0002hy-00; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:00:57 -0700
Received: from fmw by bubulina.hactrn.ch with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DPlPa-0001WH-DL
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:00:54 +0200
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 20:00:54 +0200
From: "Florian M. Weps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing this bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm closing this bug: it has been fixed in Version 1.5.9-4
Cheers,
Florian
--=20
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (private) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian-related)
GPG Key ID: B34A0F1D =20
GPG Fingerprint: 6FFC 6751 BBB8 0F60 C39D AB72 4A77 581C B34A 0F1D
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCa97VSndYHLNKDx0RAm5gAJ92eLQRZuBqZBlhrR3IxtnjRoxVhwCgp/OD
o5SHo+R1owzzcEHpUqByLMk=
=Y3Xz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
