Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:24 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281596: fixed in tuxracer 0.61-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2004 20:12:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 16 12:12:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.1.17] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CU9gR-0005Ie-00; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:12:11 -0800
Received: from rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E734511710
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:21:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pc53542 (pc53542.psychologie.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.142.45])
        by rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20911170A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:21:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from loopback ([127.0.0.1] ident=rur23430)
        by pc53542 with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CU9gP-0001fS-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:12:09 +0100
From: Roland Marcus Rutschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Replace tuxracer with pp-racer
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:12:05 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_Y8lmBuTYPRz23O9";
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--Boundary-02=_Y8lmBuTYPRz23O9
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: tuxracer
Version: 0.61-6.4
Severity: Wishlist

Hi,

the gpl-version of tuxracer is appearently not actively worked on any more.=
 I=20
just read about pp-racer which took the last gpl-version of tuxracer and is=
=20
actively developping it.

http://racer.planetpenguin.de/

Shouldn't tuxracer be subseeded by ppracer? (There's no itp for ppracer as =
of=20
now)

Regards,

Roland



=2D-=20
=2D-------------------------------------------
Roland Marcus Rutschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=2D-------------------------------------------


--Boundary-02=_Y8lmBuTYPRz23O9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBml8YqE9wmu3T13kRAqgeAKCio3vhXMGLGZRlhMtc/4PJ0ZTRHgCfc0WZ
CXKWatGGP9GdCcj9O5l1GtI=
=0WTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_Y8lmBuTYPRz23O9--


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 281596-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 06:12:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 23:12:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DR2Gh-0007XL-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 23:12:59 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DR26S-000850-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:24 -0400
From: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#281596: fixed in tuxracer 0.61-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 02:02:24 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: tuxracer
Source-Version: 0.61-7

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxracer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tuxracer-data_0.61-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tuxracer/tuxracer-data_0.61-7_all.deb
tuxracer_0.61-7.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tuxracer/tuxracer_0.61-7.dsc
tuxracer_0.61-7.tar.gz
  to pool/main/t/tuxracer/tuxracer_0.61-7.tar.gz
tuxracer_0.61-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/tuxracer/tuxracer_0.61-7_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tuxracer package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:14:30 +0200
Source: tuxracer
Binary: tuxracer tuxracer-data
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.61-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 tuxracer   - dummy transition package
 tuxracer-data - dummy transition package
Closes: 281596
Changes: 
 tuxracer (0.61-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * bumped standards version to 3.6.1 (no changes
   * tuxracer is now a transistation package to ppracer, therefore
     - removed the game itself
     - made it a native package (including lintian override for the package
           revision)
     - set architecure to all
     - added a README.Debian
     - added a small script, telling people to use ppracer instead, pointing to
       the Readme
     - Closes: #281596
Files: 
 75ab10bf7698394636c0f13ce02c23ee 507 games optional tuxracer_0.61-7.dsc
 9f1043a11171ee03c46d78d80e5358c3 5320 games optional tuxracer_0.61-7.tar.gz
 534508cb7233466fcf5682e6ca5839ea 5648 games optional tuxracer_0.61-7_all.deb
 1472aaf8ba972829ab1926f16ad18ace 4420 games optional 
tuxracer-data_0.61-7_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCcHdwYDBbMcCf01oRAlqjAKCpHRfAWnuplZLDF/PrbYJ39Y4LoACfYzxt
FScpIFda9F/LEl0OBBJ4YIw=
=YCHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to