Your message dated Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:16:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-samba-maint] Bug#441971: smbfs: tail -f on growing file 
shared from WINXP BOX not working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.24-6etch4
Severity: important



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
pl_PL)

Versions of packages smbfs depends on:
ii  libc6    2.3.6.ds1-13etch2               GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libcomer 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2 common error description library
ii  libkrb53 1.4.4-7etch2                    MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap2 2.1.30-13.3                     OpenLDAP libraries
ii  netbase  4.29                            Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  samba-co 3.0.24-6etch4                   Samba common files used by both th

smbfs recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

tail -f not working, less F not working, when I list the mounted directory, I 
see that file has all time the sime size, what is not true.

For example perl script which not working to

my $fn = '/mounted_from_xp/file.txt';
open (FH, "<$fn");
for (;;) {
        while (<FH>) {
                print $_;
        }
        sleep 1;
        seek(FH, 0, 1);
}



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> > If the bug doesn't happen with cifs, then this bug will join the long
> > list of "smbfs sucks" bugs until we finally decide to completely remove
> > the smbfs utilities from the smbfs package
> 
> Few test shown that mounting using CIFS with option "directio" solved my 
> problem, so if smbfs will be no longer used, i recomend to close this 
> request. 


It is used.....but mostly for backwards compabibility and to avoid
breaking existing setups....so, well, when issues are fixed with
mount.cifs, we  might as well close them of mark them "please rot
forever in the BTS"...

Hence closing..:)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to