Your message dated Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:27:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing old 'oops' bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oops
Version: 1.5.19.cvs.20010818-0.1
Severity: minor
Opps tells me, that it is best to answer yes in debconfig, that one should
reconsider the answer because it formats data.
All in all this debconfig prompt is not clear:
- what is oops
- what kind of data will be formatted
- why is the formatdata needed?
- when will it be formatted?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calista 2.4.20-xfs #10 Tue Feb 11 03:52:02 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages oops depends on:
ii debconf 1.2.35 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-8 The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii libpcre3 3.9-1 Philip Hazel's Perl Compatible Reg
-- debconf information:
* oops/format: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oops
Dear submitter,
Oops has been removed from debian/unstable on 19 Aug 2007 as documented
in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438648. I'm
therefore closing the bugs as directed by the removal notification.
Thanks again for your interest in the oops package. I'm sorry that this
package was in such a bad shape, therefore I think removing it was the
best way to deal with the package.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--- End Message ---
