Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 22:19:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line i believe this was fixed a time ago, wasn't it?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 10:51:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 03:51:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2.uklinux.net [80.84.72.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BzvMr-0008HN-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:51:02 -0700
Received: from polya2 (jackyoung.free-online.co.uk [81.174.156.245])
by mail2.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1662F409FBA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jdg by polya2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Bzv68-0000UU-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:44 +0100
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:33:36 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian bug reports <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: elinks: ignores configuration files completely
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
Sender: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: elinks
Version: 0.9.1+0.9.2pre4-1
Severity: important
elinks appears to totally ignore /etc/elinks/elinks.conf. And it's
not because it's in the wrong directory either: copying this file to
/etc/elinks.conf has no effect either. In fact, strings
/usr/bin/elinks shows no trace of /etc/elinks, and an strace shows no
attempt to load any elinks.conf file.
Julian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 267962-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 20:20:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 13:20:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lifeforce.hu (narya.grin.hu) [195.38.113.134]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTmpI-0002Cw-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 13:20:05 -0700
Received: from localhost.lifeforce.hu ([127.0.0.1] helo=narya)
by narya.grin.hu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DTmp3-0002KK-So
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 May 2005 22:20:00 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 22:19:45 +0200
From: Peter Gervai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: i believe this was fixed a time ago, wasn't it?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Disorganized
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -5.8 (-----)
X-Scan-Signature: 42233fd81531ff17987cb70dcb0d8664
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
$subj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
