Your message dated Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:32:02 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446074: fixed in apt-build 0.12.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apt-build
Version: 0.12.28
Severity: important
At 1191622687 time_t, apt-build development list wrote:
> there has been a bug reported at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149360,
> which covers the case where no /etc/apt/sources.list file is present.
>
> I've provided a fix there, which creates a new /etc/apt/sources.list
> file, but maybe apt-build should use a file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/
> by itself?
>
> Would /etc/apt/sources.list.d/00-aptbuild get considered before all
> other sources?
>
> Please consider that I've changed apt-build locally already, so that it
> produces packages like "apt 0.6.46.4ubuntu10+aptbuild" already, which
> would make the "sort order" unimportant.
> So /etc/apt/sources.list.d/apt-build would work with this change in mind.
>
> What do you think?
I think that it's not the right fix.
It should not grep anymore but create a file in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d and that's all.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://julien.danjou.info
// 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: apt-build
Source-Version: 0.12.29
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apt-build, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
apt-build_0.12.29.dsc
to pool/main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.29.dsc
apt-build_0.12.29.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.29.tar.gz
apt-build_0.12.29_amd64.deb
to pool/main/a/apt-build/apt-build_0.12.29_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated apt-build package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:17:56 +0100
Source: apt-build
Binary: apt-build
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.12.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
apt-build - frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages
Closes: 434366 437510 444487 446074
Changes:
apt-build (0.12.29) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Don't touch sources.list anymore (Closes: #446074)
* Don't die on no sources (Closes: #444487)
* Add sk translation (Closes: #437510)
* Fix typo in README.Debian (Closes: #434366)
Files:
c9ce82451fab047a6c4eb93318621349 516 devel optional apt-build_0.12.29.dsc
b4be79c004d3df2f7025dd602e0dea58 41384 devel optional apt-build_0.12.29.tar.gz
87c9d82f3a0dea5edd9679b08cd7b2e1 34744 devel optional
apt-build_0.12.29_amd64.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHSwB4pGK1HsL+5c0RAtnKAKCGk76ttfQHwc6Tz7KLQlYwEs0LrACgl1X0
SYIUMpYizErWKRgn23X6C0I=
=Pt+9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
