Your message dated Tue, 25 Dec 2007 22:46:28 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 002-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cpufrequtils
Version: 002-5
Severity: normal
If using insserv to reorder init scripts based on their hints,
loadcpufreq and cpufrequtils end up having equal weight, but
alphabetically cpufrequtils comes first, causing it to fail with default
setup.
Adding the init hint "Should-Start: loadcpufreq" to cpufrequtils works.
- Jonas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-rc5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=da_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages cpufrequtils depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.17 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.7-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcpufreq0 002-5 shared library to deal with the cp
ii lsb-base 3.1-24 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
cpufrequtils recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
cpufrequtils/enable: true
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I believe this bug to be fixed in version 002-6 of cpufrequtils recently
uploaded to archive. See also #451482
Thanks, Kel.
--- End Message ---
