Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:54:47 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line links: [config] Move /etc/links.cfg under /etc/<package>/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: links
Version: 0.99+1.00pre12-1
Severity: minor
The /etc hierarchy is quite polluted with various configuration files.
It would be better if packages kept configuration files under their
own directories (easier for backups etc.).
Please move /etc/links.cfg => /etc/<package>/config or
/etc/<package>/links.conf
Note, it would better use *.conf for common configuration file extension.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages links depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgpmg1 1.19.6-21 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
links recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
well your suggestion makes two files out of one.
a directory and a config file, while it's just one file right now.
i fail to see an improvement on your suggestion, actually it makes it
worse...
feel free to re-open if you think i'm wrong.
--
while(!asleep()) sheep++;
--- End Message ---
