Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:32:03 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459577: fixed in intercal 27:0.27-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: intercal
Version: 27:0.27-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hopefully I have remembered to attach the patch this time!

There were some bugs in the optimiser (and a parser bug that looks like an 
optimiser bug) in the released upstream version 0.27 of C-INTERCAL; such bugs 
also exist in the Debian version. A small patch has been released upstream to 
fix these (some minor, one that can cause a segfault in an unusual mode of 
operation, and a bug that can cause incorrect code to be generated in some 
left-shifts); the same patch is attached here. Could it be applied to the 
Debian distribution?

Authorship: the patch was partly written by me and partly by Joris Huizer.

Thanks!

Alex Smith, C-INTERCAL upstream maintainer

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers gutsy-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'gutsy-updates'), (500, 'gutsy-security'), (500, 'gutsy'), 
(500, 'feisty-backports')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-14-generic (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages intercal depends on:
ii  gcc [c-compiler]        4:4.1.2-9ubuntu2 The GNU C compiler
ii  gcc-4.1 [c-compiler]    4.1.2-16ubuntu2  The GNU C compiler
ii  libc6                   2.6.1-1ubuntu10  GNU C Library: Shared libraries

intercal recommends no packages.

Attachment: ick-1.0.27.diff
Description: ick-1.0.27.diff


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: intercal
Source-Version: 27:0.27-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
intercal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

intercal_0.27-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/intercal/intercal_0.27-3.diff.gz
intercal_0.27-3.dsc
  to pool/main/i/intercal/intercal_0.27-3.dsc
intercal_0.27-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/intercal/intercal_0.27-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated intercal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:25:35 -0500
Source: intercal
Binary: intercal
Architecture: source i386
Version: 27:0.27-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 intercal   - an INTERCAL de-obfuscator
Closes: 459577
Changes: 
 intercal (27:0.27-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Upstream patch fixing bugs in the optimiser and parser. Closes: #459577
Files: 
 4bdc70d8d1cc6c9ac986a8aa4d193398 707 interpreters optional intercal_0.27-3.dsc
 6af274331cb18f085c3f708d24014bf1 6167 interpreters optional 
intercal_0.27-3.diff.gz
 32da16584f1f76c5ecda6fb3f702e543 655848 interpreters optional 
intercal_0.27-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHgn3W2tp5zXiKP0wRAm9iAJ9WfSvKRkt0a/K59zhTFSNkd52jzQCfXdTm
ZLXLY80IszhmIyigqa9SxvI=
=GRyt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to