Your message dated Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:23:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#132453: NMU diff for this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bwm
Version: 1.1.0-7
Severity: normal
bwm does a wrong calculation of the bandwidth used when it's above
(MAX_ULONG/1000) bytes / s, which happens on a 100Mb/s LAN for instance.
Quick and dirty fix below:
--- bwm.c~ Sat Feb 3 03:51:38 2001
+++ bwm.c Tue Feb 5 12:46:40 2002
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
interface[inum].rx_kbytes_dif =
(interface[inum].rx_bytes_new -
- interface[inum].rx_bytes_old) * 1000 / 1024;
+ interface[inum].rx_bytes_old) / 1024 * 1000;
interface[inum].rx_rate_whole =
interface[inum].rx_kbytes_dif /
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
interface[inum].tx_kbytes_dif =
(interface[inum].tx_bytes_new -
- interface[inum].tx_bytes_old) * 1000 / 1024;
+ interface[inum].tx_bytes_old) / 1024 * 1000;
interface[inum].tx_rate_whole =
interface[inum].tx_kbytes_dif /
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Versions of the packages bwm depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.1.0-8.1
On 25/01/06 at 19:32 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to upload a NMU to fix this bug, patch attached.
>
> Thanks,
Interestingly, this bug was never marked as fixed in 1.1.0-8.1. I don't
know what went wrong, but I'm marking it as fixed manually...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
