Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:43:34 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306850: procps: top multiple window broken in last version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: procps
Version: 1:3.2.5-1
Severity: normal
the multiple window version of top (obtained using 'A') is not working
correctly in the last procps version. most notably, the first 2 or 3
lines at the top are missing. this issue seem to be related to the size
of the window. my own .toprc is attached.
cheers, piem
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-rc3-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages procps depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
-- no debconf information
RCfile for "top with windows" # shameless braggin'
Id:a, Mode_altscr=1, Mode_irixps=1, Delay_time=3.000, Curwin=0
Def fieldscur=AEHIOQTWKNMbcdfgjplrsuvyzX
winflags=64824, sortindx=10, maxtasks=0
summclr=1, msgsclr=1, headclr=3, taskclr=1
Job fieldscur=ABcefgjlrstuvyzMKNHIWOPQDX
winflags=64824, sortindx=0, maxtasks=0
summclr=6, msgsclr=6, headclr=7, taskclr=6
Mem fieldscur=ANOPQRSTUVbcdefgjlmyzWHIKX
winflags=64824, sortindx=13, maxtasks=0
summclr=5, msgsclr=5, headclr=4, taskclr=5
Usr fieldscur=ABDECGfhijlopqrstuvyzMKNWX
winflags=64824, sortindx=4, maxtasks=0
summclr=3, msgsclr=3, headclr=2, taskclr=3
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Paul Brossier, le Wed 16 Jan 2008 12:39:38 +0000, a écrit :
> I have just tried with different terms and different sizes, and could
> not reproduce this bug, so yes, it probably went away in the mean time!
Should be fine then, thanks for checking.
Samuel
--- End Message ---
