Your message dated Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:42:29 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gpe-edit
Severity: minor
Why not include gpe-* packages in section embedded ? The mainteners of
opie packages do it in this way.
I think this could be more logic.
PS : I only send bug report for this package but I think this affect all
package named "gpe-*".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux oxygen 2.4.22-ck2-686-1 #1 Tue Oct 7 22:09:13 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I'm taking over maintenance of gpe-edit from Phil Blundell and I also
maintain (or co-maintain) the other GPE packages in Debian.
Some of these packages are "Section: embedded" but this is only done
when it is unwise to use the package on a non-embedded system - i.e.
where the package conflicts with basic parts of GNOME or KDE.
The majority of GPE can be used on normal systems and there are many
systems where low resources and other requirements mean that a full
desktop like GNOME cannot be installed.
gedit is getting to be a large application - it makes sense to have a
very small, very fast, GUI text editor that takes up very few resources
alongside console editors.
--
Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
