Your message dated Sun, 15 May 2005 16:02:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#189888: fixed in hlatex-fonts 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Apr 2003 19:58:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 20 14:58:08 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 197Kwx-0008W5-00; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:58:07 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
        by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 197Kww-0005ic-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:58:06 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 197Kwv-0005vh-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 12:58:05 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hlatex-fonts: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 Apr 2003 12:58:05 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 23
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: hlatex-fonts
Version: 0.991-2
Severity: normal

>From my build log:

...
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127

The source package needs at least debhelper in its
Build-Depends-Indep.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686 
unknown unknown GNU/Linux

-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 189888-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 20:18:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 13:18:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DXPZB-0004gm-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 13:18:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DXPKE-0001Gw-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 16:02:58 -0400
From: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#189888: fixed in hlatex-fonts 1.0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:02:58 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: hlatex-fonts
Source-Version: 1.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hlatex-fonts, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hlatex-fonts-base_1.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hlatex-fonts/hlatex-fonts-base_1.0-1_all.deb
hlatex-fonts-extra_1.0-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hlatex-fonts/hlatex-fonts-extra_1.0-1_all.deb
hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hlatex-fonts/hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.diff.gz
hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hlatex-fonts/hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.dsc
hlatex-fonts_1.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/h/hlatex-fonts/hlatex-fonts_1.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hlatex-fonts package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 02:46:55 +0900
Source: hlatex-fonts
Binary: hlatex-fonts-base hlatex-fonts-extra
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Changwoo Ryu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 hlatex-fonts-base - basic HLaTeX fonts files
 hlatex-fonts-extra - extra HLaTeX fonts files
Closes: 189888
Changes: 
 hlatex-fonts (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release.
   * Maintainer release. (Closes: 189888)
   * Standard-Version: 3.6.1.
   * Depends on debhelper >= 4.
Files: 
 3cad355c338a7587b354534cbfafc1f1 602 tex optional hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.dsc
 f93a8b2df600e4fbae3590ad413a7811 52016827 tex optional 
hlatex-fonts_1.0.orig.tar.gz
 abf5365b1713d85b39e5bf294c3c9f91 1988 tex optional hlatex-fonts_1.0-1.diff.gz
 d539f1a3da5f724c5e402e7742c62422 20494342 tex optional 
hlatex-fonts-base_1.0-1_all.deb
 44559cd6f2e5df9f5a582e80dc7f11a3 35656486 tex optional 
hlatex-fonts-extra_1.0-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCh6A4AbRzNODUnpkRAtx3AJwO+mGzmPD+Ot/v8qNYIVercF5qLgCfYNxQ
EK4iafgGMHZA6D9Ev6SUQZk=
=Vagh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to