Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:57:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464348: fatal: service virtual requires privileged 
operation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.8-2+b1
Severity: normal

Hello,
I just wanted to signal that I've exactly the same problem as described in bug 
315939 but with the service "virtual" with postfix 2.3.8-2+b1
Of course I tried to send a followup for bug #315939, before creating a new 
report but I always get a "delivery failure" for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I make my own report. Here's the postfix log for this error

> Feb  6 11:09:02 ns3 postfix/virtual[29378]: fatal: service virtual requires 
> privileged operation
> Feb  6 11:09:03 ns3 postfix/master[29355]: warning: process 
> /usr/lib/postfix/virtual pid 29378 exit status 1
> Feb  6 11:09:03 ns3 postfix/master[29355]: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/virtual: 
> bad command startup -- throttling

I tried the same fix for virtual service as proposed in #315939 for mailman 
service, and it seems to work

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-6-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii  adduser                3.102             Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.11etch1       Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg                   1.13.25           package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6                  2.3.6.ds1-13etch4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.3               4.3.29-8          Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii  libsasl2-2             2.1.22.dfsg1-8    Authentication abstraction library
ii  libssl0.9.8            0.9.8c-4etch1     SSL shared libraries
ii  lsb-base               3.1-23.2etch1     Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  netbase                4.29              Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  ssl-cert               1.0.14            Simple debconf wrapper for openssl

Versions of packages postfix recommends:
ii  mailx [mail-read 1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent
ii  mutt [mail-reade 1.5.13-1.1etch1         text-based mailreader supporting M

-- debconf information:
  postfix/master_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/db_upgrade_warning: true
* postfix/mailname: ns3.mimizan.net
  postfix/tlsmgr_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/dynamicmaps_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/recipient_delim: +
* postfix/main_mailer_type: Internet Site
  postfix/transport_map_warning:
  postfix/relayhost:
  postfix/procmail: true
  postfix/bad_recipient_delimiter:
  postfix/chattr: faux
  postfix/root_address:
  postfix/rfc1035_violation: false
  postfix/mydomain_warning:
  postfix/mynetworks: 127.0.0.0/8
  postfix/destinations: ns3.mimizan.net, localhost.mimizan.net, , localhost
  postfix/nqmgr_upgrade_warning:
  postfix/not_configured:
  postfix/mailbox_limit: 0
  postfix/protocols: all



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.3.8-2+b1
--

On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 11:32:18AM +0100, root wrote:
> > Feb  6 11:09:02 ns3 postfix/virtual[29378]: fatal: service virtual requires 
> > privileged operation
> > Feb  6 11:09:03 ns3 postfix/master[29355]: warning: process 
> > /usr/lib/postfix/virtual pid 29378 exit status 1
> > Feb  6 11:09:03 ns3 postfix/master[29355]: warning: 
> > /usr/lib/postfix/virtual: bad command startup -- throttling
> I tried the same fix for virtual service as proposed in #315939 for mailman 
> service, and it seems to work

As delivered, 2.3.8-2(+b1) does have an 'n' in the fourth column...  Can
you provide some clues as to how it was that your installation didn't
have that?

Not a bug unless there's a way to reproduce it.

lamont


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to