Your message dated Fri, 8 Feb 2008 00:05:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line don't suggests sword-frontend
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: libclucene0
Severity: minor

Why does libclucene0 suggest sword-frontend?  Is this some sort of
strange form of proselytization by the package maintainer.  If I want to
install a SWORD frontend, I'll do it myself.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.20-1


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to