Your message dated Fri, 20 May 2005 11:12:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line this bug is not relevant any more
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2005 23:21:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 25 15:21:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from iron.libaux.ucsf.edu [128.218.15.248]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEy7M-0006Za-00; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:21:29 -0800
Received: from ross by iron.libaux.ucsf.edu with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DEy6r-0005YK-7I
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:20:57 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libboost-dev: files vanish on upgrade to 1.32.0-2
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:20:57 -0800
X-Debbugs-Cc:
=?iso-8859-15?q?ross=40biostat=2Eucsf=2Eedu=0D=0A***_Please_type_your_report?=,
=?iso-8859-15?q?_below_this_line_***=0D=0AThis_appears_very_similar_to_29034?=,
=?iso-8859-15?q?0=2C_although_that_one_is_reported_to=0D=0Abe_a_case_of_the_?=,
=?iso-8859-15?q?file_migrating_between_packages=2E?=
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on iron.libaux.ucsf.edu); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libboost-dev
Version: 1.32.0-4
Severity: important
I've had libboost-dev installed for awhile, and recently went through
an upgrade to 1.32 (I think directly to 1.32.0-2). With version
1.32.0-2 installed, I was misssing at least the following two files
under /usr/include/boost:
config.hpp
operators.hpp
dpkg -L at the time reported both files were in the libboost-dev
package. The folks on the boost list say that without config.hpp
nothing will compile. There were other config.hpp's present, but not
in that directory. config.hpp was present in the top directory in
1.31 as well.
This certainly broke my builds with boost.
I just pulled 1.32.0-4 from unstable, and that seems to have repaired
the problem. Since I don't see anything in the changelog about this,
my guess is that it was simply installing (upgrading, literally) twice
that fixed the problem.
So I believe my system is OK, but if this is happening generally it's
a pretty serious probem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (40, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27adnvcd
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libboost-dev depends on:
ii libstdc++5-3.3-dev [libstdc++ 1:3.3.5-8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
ii libstdc++6-dev [libstdc++-dev 3.4.3-6 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301449-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2005 09:12:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 20 02:12:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mail.netline.it) [217.19.149.7]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZ3YH-0004nx-00; Fri, 20 May 2005 02:12:18 -0700
Received: (qmail 4981 invoked by uid 106); 20 May 2005 09:11:48 -0000
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.netline.it by uid 0 with
qmail-scanner-1.22
(clamdscan: 0.73. Clear:RC:0(82.50.81.10):.
Processed in 0.021864 secs); 20 May 2005 09:11:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO raptus.dandreoli.com) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]@82.50.81.10)
by mail.netline.it with SMTP; 20 May 2005 09:11:48 -0000
Received: by raptus.dandreoli.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E779A78BB9E; Fri, 20 May 2005 11:12:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:12:15 +0200
From: Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: this bug is not relevant any more
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
hi,
i'm closing this report, it affects package versions not in debian archives.
cheers
domenico
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://people.debian.org/~cavok/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
