Your message dated Mon, 3 Mar 2008 07:31:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#469086: xulrunner: bashism in /bin/sh script
has caused the Debian Bug report #469086,
regarding xulrunner: bashism in /bin/sh script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
469086: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xulrunner
Severity: important
Version: 1.8.1.12-2
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package)
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/xulrunner line 167 ($(OS|MACH)TYPE):
> if [ "$OSTYPE" = "beos" ]; then
Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors or unexpected behaviours.
Please be aware that although
bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to
make dash the default /bin/sh[1].
If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
[1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt
Thank you,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 05:51:58PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: xulrunner
> Severity: important
> Version: 1.8.1.12-2
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: goal-dash
>
> Hello maintainer,
>
> While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
> package)
> check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
> use of a bashism.
>
> checkbashisms' output:
> > possible bashism in ./usr/bin/xulrunner line 167 ($(OS|MACH)TYPE):
> > if [ "$OSTYPE" = "beos" ]; then
>
>
> Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors or unexpected behaviours.
> Please be aware that although
> bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to
> make dash the default /bin/sh[1].
Considering the test it is doing, and that it's the only, and that
$OSTYPE is unlikely to be "beos" in dash, I think we can just leave it
alone.
Mike
--- End Message ---
