Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 14:51:15 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libapache2-mod-fastcgi missing in Sarge, no outstanding bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2004 20:05:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 12 12:05:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.80]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CdZyC-0005Ak-00; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:05:28 -0800
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@68.75.48.169
with plain)
by smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2004 20:05:27 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 14:04:33 -0600
From: FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libapache2-mod-fastcgi missing in Sarge, no outstanding bugs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
package: libapache2-mod-fastcgi
severity: wishlist
We'd like to see libapache2-mod-fastcgi moved into Sarge.
We've been using libapache2-mod-fastcgi 2.4.2-5 and it doesn't appear to
have any outstanding bugs.
Since this is a popular server application, it would beneficial to have
this in the next stable release of Debian so that the security team can
fix any new issues that might arise.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285361-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 12:51:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 05:51:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZpvj-0002oq-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 05:51:43 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 May 2005 12:51:12 -0000
Received: from chello080108252219.4.14.tuwien.teleweb.at (EHLO netcom)
[80.108.252.219]
by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 22 May 2005 14:51:12 +0200
X-Authenticated: #2339339
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Rene Konasz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: libapache2-mod-fastcgi missing in Sarge, no outstanding bugs
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:51:15 +0200
Organization: TheStar netCom
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Tatsuki, thank you for your effort! Both libapache-mod-fastcgi and
libapache2-mod-fastcgi 2.4.2-6 entered sarge today.
Best regards, Ren�
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
