Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310036: apt-get upgrade failes at slapd
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 08:00:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 01:00:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZOu3-0007UY-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 01:00:11 -0700
Received: from 212-41-64-138.adsl.solnet.ch (localhost.localdomain)
[212.41.64.138]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZOu2-0004TC-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 03:00:10 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ronny Standtke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-get upgrade failes at slapd
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:00:08 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: slapd
Version: 2.2.23-5
Severity: important
I get the following error when upgrading:
-------------------------
# apt-get -u upgrade
....
Setting up slapd (2.2.23-5) ...
mkdir: cannot create directory `': No such file or directory
Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.conf in ... mkdir: cannot create directory
`': No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing slapd (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
slapd
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-------------------------
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
de_CH)
Versions of packages slapd depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii debconf 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libiodbc2 3.52.2-3 iODBC Driver Manager
ii libldap-2.2-7 2.2.23-5 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libltdl3 1.5.6-6 A system independent dlopen wrappe
ii libperl5.8 5.8.4-8 Shared Perl library
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1.5 Authentication abstraction library
ii libslp1 1.0.11a-2 OpenSLP libraries
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libwrap0 7.6.dbs-8 Wietse Venema's TCP wrappers libra
ii perl [libmime-base64-perl] 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii psmisc 21.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
-- debconf information:
slapd/password_mismatch:
slapd/fix_directory: true
slapd/invalid_config: true
* shared/organization: onnies
slapd/upgrade_slapcat_failure:
slapd/upgrade_slapadd_failure:
slapd/backend: BDB
* slapd/dump_database: when needed
* slapd/allow_ldap_v2: false
slapd/no_configuration: false
slapd/move_old_database: true
slapd/suffix_change: false
slapd/slave_databases_require_updateref:
* slapd/dump_database_destdir:
slapd/autoconf_modules: true
slapd/purge_database: false
slapd/admin:
* slapd/domain: onnies.ch
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310036-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2005 15:04:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 08:04:17 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tms.rz.uni-kiel.de [134.245.11.89]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaETZ-00018l-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 08:04:17 -0700
Received: from amavis by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de with scanned-ok (Exim 4.34)
id 1DaETV-0001tE-IM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:13 +0200
Received: from zaphod.gpi.uni-kiel.de ([134.245.120.1])
by tms.rz.uni-kiel.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DaETT-0001t6-JZ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:11 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=stargate.galaxy)
by zaphod.gpi.uni-kiel.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DaETT-0002ja-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:11 +0200
Received: by stargate.galaxy (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A1FA71806A; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:04:10 +0200
From: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310036: apt-get upgrade failes at slapd
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12 (Uni-Kiel/tms)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi again,=20
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:23:45AM +0200, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> > Probably :) BTW: Did you manage to get slapd working now?
>=20
> Yes, slapd works now. Thank you very much!
Closing the bug on the grounds that it is probably a dupe of the default
dumpdir bug.
Greetings
Torsten
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkfDqdQgHtVUb5EcRAs11AJ0YD0dgtiI/9SkBEtEzwB/FydPu/QCeNMi4
XuuljxU0QVKFryzad+UZkpM=
=9/N3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
