Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2005 19:27:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 12:09:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 05:09:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZpGt-0006jP-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 05:09:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id F25AF44EFE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E296544ED0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id CD62026136; Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 14:09:30 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: rpy
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
Hi,
This package is failing to build in sarge but it seems to have
been fixed in sid. (-3 or -4 version?)
It's failing with the following error:
CFLAGS="-O2 -Wall" python2.2 setup.py build
Building for R version 2.1.0 ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 136, in ?
RSRC = get_R_SRC()
File "setup.py", line 57, in get_R_SRC
raise DistutilsExecError( \
distutils.errors.DistutilsExecError:
The path
/root/build/rpy-0.4.1/R-2.1.0
which should contain header files for R version 2.1.0
does not exist!
Please see the rpy README file for instructions.
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310330-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 00:28:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 23 17:28:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.89]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaNHS-00030H-00; Mon, 23 May 2005 17:28:22 -0700
Received: from basebud.nulle.part
(c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP
id <200505240027520140094ai9e>; Tue, 24 May 2005 00:27:52 +0000
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DaNGx-0003bZ-6V; Mon, 23 May 2005 19:27:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 19:27:48 -0500
To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310198: rpy: FTBFS: Does not have headers for R 2.1.0
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
reopen 310198
thanks
Sorry, I closed the wrong one. Closing #310330 is what I had meant in the
email.
Dirk
On 23 May 2005 at 19:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | Just tag it wontfix and/or forward it upstream.
|
| No, after mulling this over all day, I have decided to close it.
|
| I do not think that changing the set of distributed header files is a good
| idea.
--
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
-- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
