Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 11:26:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279177: still present?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2004 09:23:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 01:23:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.de (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COYPT-00082H-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 01:23:31 -0800
Received: (qmail 21730 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Nov 2004 09:22:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [131.173.86.161]) (131.173.86.161)
by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 01 Nov 2004 10:22:58 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:22:53 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_B=E4r?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mdadm: error opening /dev/md/0 during upgrade
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Subject: mdadm: error opening /dev/md/1 during upgrade
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.7.0-2
Severity: normal
During upgrade today i got the following error message on
my debian sarge fileserver.
My devices are /dev/md0 and /dev/md1.
Beside this message everything seems to work as expected.
If you need further information please contact me.
Thanks a lot,
Wolfgang
Richte mdadm ein (1.7.0-2) ...
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid ...
Installiere neue Version der Konfigurationsdatei /etc/init.d/mdadm ...
Starting raid devices:
mdadm: error opening /dev/md/1: No such file or directory
mdadm: error opening /dev/md/0: No such file or directory
done.
Starting RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F.
Output of cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [multipath]
md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
1975872 blocks [2/2] [UU]
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
158103552 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9first
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages mdadm depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.8 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
-- debconf information:
* mdadm/autostart: true
* mdadm/mail_to: root
* mdadm/warning:
* mdadm/start_daemon: true
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 279177-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 09:27:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 02:27:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaVgj-0000Oy-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 02:27:01 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 984718D4303;
Tue, 24 May 2005 11:26:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cirrus.madduck.net (cirrus.madduck.net [192.168.14.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "cirrus.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id EEC5F8D42F1;
Tue, 24 May 2005 11:26:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by cirrus.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EB1E620041F; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:26:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 11:26:51 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#279177: still present?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.11-cirrus i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
also sprach Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.24.1120 +0200]:
> Well was September 04 - with a daily sarge installer for testing.
> Know its our production backup server.
Yeah, makes sense.
> No, I have none ! Can you say me which owner/group permissions
> it should have ? root/disk rw-rw--- ?
I would make it rw-r------ but root:disk.
> As this is a more or less production server and I will leave in
> some hours for one week to a business trip. Is there a risk for
> breaking ?
There is always a risk of breakage. It's a very small risk, but by
Murphy's law, it will break since you are just about to go on
a trip.
> If yes, I would like to do that after my trip - so I have time to
> do some rescue work if it breaks. Sorry for the stupid questions
> but I am not a raid expert.
Nah, no need. I think the issue has resolved itself. If you ever
install another server with software RAID, maybe you can pay some
attention to this issue.
I am closing this bug as I believe that the current installer and
mdadm 1.9.0-3 will not cause this problem anymore.
Cheers,
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
http://kirch.net/unix-nt/
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkvNbIgvIgzMMSnURAlo0AJkBDE4cvC9TFeMO3MUtDcY77SMYVwCg6HX5
Mw8j6XgzR8j+SbWfrMF57rk=
=KzYo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
