Your message dated Tue, 24 May 2005 11:57:41 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#309762: octave: ocate needs lapack3, 
but this is not a dependency
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 May 2005 11:55:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 19 04:55:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from net2.wur.nl [137.224.248.102] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DYjd3-0000OF-00; Thu, 19 May 2005 04:55:53 -0700
Received: from localhost (vscan2.wur.nl [137.224.18.66])
        by net2.wur.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3F333F0C
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:55:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from net2.wur.nl ([137.224.248.102])
 by localhost (scomp1010.wur.nl [137.224.18.66]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 28219-01; Thu, 19 May 2005 13:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (atv-pre-02049.wur.nl [137.224.32.203])
        by net2.wur.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7253833F16;
        Thu, 19 May 2005 13:55:20 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Olivier Sessink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: octave: ocate needs lapack3, but this is not a dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:55:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at WUR-vscan2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: octave
Version: 2.1.69-1
Severity: normal


I got an error when starting octave:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ octave
octave: error while loading shared libraries: liblapack.so.3: cannot open 
shared object file: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd /usr/bin/octave
                liboctinterp.so => /usr/lib/octave-2.1.69/liboctinterp.so 
(0xb77f9000)
        liboctave.so => /usr/lib/octave-2.1.69/liboctave.so (0xb71d0000)
        libcruft.so => /usr/lib/octave-2.1.69/libcruft.so (0xb717a000)
        liblapack.so.3 => not found
        libblas.so.3 => not found
        libfftw3.so.3 => /usr/lib/libfftw3.so.3 (0xb70ad000)
        libreadline.so.5 => /lib/libreadline.so.5 (0xb7080000)
        libncurses.so.5 => /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0xb7040000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x41185000)
        libhdf5-1.6.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libhdf5-1.6.2.so.0 (0xb6f36000)
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x41c5b000)
        libg2c.so.0 => /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0 (0xb6f18000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x41150000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x41544000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x4140e000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x41019000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x41000000)
        liblapack.so.3 => not found
        libblas.so.3 => not found
        liblapack.so.3 => not found
        libblas.so.3 => not found
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x41174000)

the error was fixed after installing package lapack3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages octave depends on:
ii  octave2.1                     2.1.69-1   GNU Octave language for numerical 

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309762-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 09:57:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 02:57:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de [192.129.1.23] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DaWAY-00031D-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 02:57:50 -0700
Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2])
        by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1DaWGR-0004ie-N8; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:03:56 +0200
Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2)
        by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
        id 1DaWFW-0008CT-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 12:02:58 +0200
Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DaWAP-0006II-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 11:57:41 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 11:57:41 +0200
From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Olivier Sessink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#309762: octave: ocate needs lapack3, but 
this is not a dependency
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

* Olivier Sessink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-24 11:30]:

> > Could you please do the following: remove atlas3-base, lapack3,
> > liblapack.so.3, refblas3, libblas.so.3, and octave2.1 from your system.
> > Then "apt-get install octave2.1".  What do you get?
> 
> The following extra packages will be installed:
>   atlas3-base octave2.1
> Suggested packages:
>   atlas3-3dnow atlas3-sse atlas3-sse2 refblas3 lapack3 octave2.1-info
> octave2.1-doc octave2.1-htmldoc octave2.1-headers octave2.1-emacsen
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
>   atlas3-base octave octave2.1
> 
> and octave starts indeed correctly...
> 
> weird....

Thanks.  This means that there is no bug, as I thought.  I am closing
this bug report.

-- 
Rafael


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to