Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.9.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 18:43:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 10:43:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4NxG-0005rc-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:43:18 -0800
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086941210
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:42:47 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (mx4 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 33680-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:42:46 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De
[134.2.15.66])
by mx4.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E00F11EC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:42:46 +0100 (NFT)
Received: from mrvn by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1D4NtY-0000yV-PK
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:39:28 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: /sbin/mdrun: mdrun: non devfs style /proc/partitions with devfs
confuses
mdrun
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:39:28 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: mdadm
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: important
File: /sbin/mdrun
Justification: renders package unusable for D-I 2.6
Hi,
there is a problem with mdrun assuming devfs style names in
/proc/partitions when devfs support is available. With current 2.6.x
kernels the /proc/partitions file lists the standard names even with
devfs mounted. Subsequently mdrun will probe /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2,
... for raid superblocks and silently fail each time.
There are two easy ways out:
1. create any (missing?) device node (temporary?)
2. find a matching node in the /dev tree, warn if non found
(create node when AUTOCREATE is set?)
Note that leaving a /dev/sda under devfs will make the D-I partitioner
show both /dev/scsi/... and /dev/sda, showing the drive twice.
MfG
Goswin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages mdadm depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.45 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii makedev 2.3.1-76 creates device files in /dev
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296799-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 13:02:03 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 06:02:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DavWN-0004MZ-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 06:02:03 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 944698D4319;
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from piper.madduck.net (piper.madduck.net [130.60.75.69])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "piper.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0B28D2431;
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by piper.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 401031010A28; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:56 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in 1.9.0-4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 x86_64
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Spamtrap: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have reason that the bug you reported against mdadm has been fixed
in the latest release, 1.9.0-4, which you can get from
http://debian.madduck.net/~madduck/packages/nmu/mdadm
I am thus closing this bug report. If you think that the problem has
not been fixed, please feel free to reopen it!
--=20
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
"william blake, you're a dead man!"
-- nobody
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFClHdEIgvIgzMMSnURAiDiAJwNO7E7f05VKXwqWJHT/K8rZ1BPBgCfWaW9
6d9MAxVFeFN41a/yWG9JgpE=
=hWBv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
