Your message dated Wed, 25 May 2005 16:38:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Acknowledging NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2004 13:00:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 24 06:00:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.westernamerican.com (mail.wamgr.com) [208.255.11.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CApgh-0006bT-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:00:36 -0700
Received: from net1-111.wamgr.com ([192.168.1.111] helo=asbestos.wamgr.com)
by mail.wamgr.com with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.24)
id 1CApfs-0000Vj-Sz; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:59:44 -0400
Received: from greg by asbestos.wamgr.com with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CApfw-00012r-2q; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:59:48 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: udev doesn't create /dev/md* in time for mdadm-raid to start them. All
sw-raid filesys fail to mount.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:59:48 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: udev
Version: 0.031-2
Severity: important
Filesystems shown are succesfully started when udev is not installed. They boot
just fine without any failures.
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/md1 1989568 62356 1927212 4% /
/dev/md0 141760 6932 134828 5% /boot
/dev/md4 9989504 292 9989212 1% /home
/dev/md3 995008 660 994348 1% /tmp
/dev/md5 15426176 273940 15152236 2% /usr
/dev/md2 9989504 80676 9908828 1% /var
As soon as udev is installed all filesystems except /dev/md1 fail, as /dev/md1
is started by linuxrc in the initrd.
I have been able to seed in a workaround in initrd-tools.sh at the end to
manually create these /dev/md*.
----------begin workaround
if [ ! -f /dev/md0 ] && [ -x /bin/mknod ] ; then
for i in 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ; do
node="/dev/md$i"
/bin/mknod $node b 9 $i || /bin/echo "error mknod \"$node\" create
failed"
/bin/chmod 0660 $node || /bin/echo "error chmod \"$node\" failed"
done
fi
----------end workaround
The Debconf info was just the warnings as I installed udev to make it easier to
use reportbug.
I have tried a dev.d script and it still does not create the /dev/md* device
nodes early enough.
The kernel modules for md and raid* are inserted as the first modules it loads.
So it cannot be the modules being loaded
soon enough for udevd to notice.
Either I am missing something obvious or it is somehow brokeon or slowed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7 (2.6.8-3)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages udev depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.36 Debian configuration management sy
ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-15 Linux Hotplug Scripts
ii initscripts 2.86-5 Standard scripts needed for bootin
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libnewt0.51 0.51.6-16 Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273182-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2005 14:38:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 25 07:38:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dax1u-0002GY-00; Wed, 25 May 2005 07:38:42 -0700
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 91D608D4319;
Wed, 25 May 2005 16:38:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from piper.madduck.net (piper.madduck.net [130.60.75.69])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "piper.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 476EB8D2431;
Wed, 25 May 2005 16:38:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by piper.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C886A1010A28; Wed, 25 May 2005 16:38:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:38:37 +0200
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Acknowledging NMUs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 x86_64
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
As new co-maintainer of mdadm, I herewith acknowledge my previous
NMUs, which have all persisted through the latest release, 1.9.0-4.
These bugs are therefore ready to be archived.
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
=20
"the problem with america is stupidity. i'm not saying there should
be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take
the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve
itself?"
-- seen on irc
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFClI3tIgvIgzMMSnURApCZAKDoNdD6JZNJpr52Zb5WZIl38+G8pACcD3PU
PwhpRYyuY1mIEOqFTaUwTxs=
=hG72
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
