Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:51:15 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line solved by list archive regeneration
has caused the Debian Bug report #389582,
regarding archive indices don't recognize ISO-8859-15 and KOI8-r properly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
389582: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389582
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lists.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-04
Severity: important
lists.debian.org currently uses MHonArc 2.5.2, which does not support
multiple character sets very well. It should be updated to mhonarc
2.5.8-1 or later, which supports the option of storing all archives
as UTF-8. With that option, users using different character sets on
the same list would still see their messages archived correctly.
For examples of these problems, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-french/2002/debian-l10n-french-200208/threads.html
which contains the fragment
Phrase =?iso-8859-15?Q?incompr=E9hensible?= Arthur
This currently cannot be presented correctly since mhonarc does not know
what to do with ISO-8859-15. Even worse,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-russian/2002/debian-russian-200208/threads.html
comes out all-incorrect in the Webbrowser, since the page does not
declare any encoding.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kosh 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
it seems that this bug is completely solved for all of our archive at
least since the recent list archive regeneration. In case you
disagree, please reopen this bug and send a link to a message / index
page still exhibiting the problem in question.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--- End Message ---
