Your message dated Sat, 12 Apr 2008 05:24:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: oprofile: bashism in /bin/sh script
has caused the Debian Bug report #465350,
regarding oprofile: bashism in /bin/sh script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
465350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: oprofile
Severity: important
Version: 0.9.3-1.1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hello maintainer,
While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package)
check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
use of a bashism.
checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 387 (cnt=$((cnt + 1)) does not
> work in dash): for f in `seq 0 $((NR_CHOSEN - 1))`; do
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 578 (cnt=$((cnt + 1)) does not
> work in dash): for f in `seq 0 $((NR_CHOSEN - 1))`; do
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 600 (cnt=$((cnt + 1)) does not
> work in dash): for f in `seq 0 $((NR_CHOSEN - 1))`; do
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 1204 (cnt=$((cnt + 1)) does
> not work in dash): for f in `seq 0 $((NR_CHOSEN - 1))`; do
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 1250 (let ...):
> let loop_count=1
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 1259 (let ...):
> let loop_count="$loop_count"+1
> possible bashism in ./usr/bin/opcontrol line 1361 (cnt=$((cnt + 1)) does
> not work in dash): for f in `seq 0 $((NR_CHOSEN - 1))`; do
Not using bash as /bin/sh would lead to errors. Please be aware that although
bash is currently the default /bin/sh there's a release goal for Lenny to
make dash the default /bin/sh[1].
If you want more information about dash as /bin/sh, you can read:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/01/msg00189.html
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
[1]http://release.debian.org/lenny/goals.txt
Thank you,
--
Atomo64 - Raphael
Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: oprofile
> Version: 0.9.3-1.1
[...]
> While performing an archive wide checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts'
> package) check I've found your package containing a /bin/sh script making
> use of a bashism.
This was fixed in 0.9.3-2 (confirmed):
oprofile (0.9.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Closes: bug#447797 -- remove bashisms from opcontrol (used patch from
ubuntu)
[...]
-- Al Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 10 Feb 2008 11:51:49 -0700
Regards,
--
Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG: 0x634F9A20
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
