Your message dated Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:40:12 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line scigraphica has been removed from Debian, closing #167061
has caused the Debian Bug report #167061,
regarding scigraphica: segmentation fault when scigraphica closed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
167061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=167061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: scigraphica
Version: 0.8.0-4.1
Severity: important
Tags: sid

I was using scigraphica to plot some graphs, then I left it for awhile,
then I closed it by clicking on the "x" at the top of the window.  I got
an error message box saying that there was a segmentation fault and that
the file had been saved to a rescue file.

I started scigraphica again and tried to open the original file again,
but that caused anohter segmentation fault.  I started scigraphica a
third time and opened the rescue file, which opened OK.  But the rescue
file had saved recent changes "selectively".  It had saved the two
recently added worksheets, but not hte two recently added graphs, one of
which had been added *before* the second worksheet.  (This incorrect
behaviour isn't as drastically wrong as a week ago when scigraphica did
similar stuff but the rescue file wouldn't open at all.)

I have tried to recreate the bug, but it seems to be only happening
occasionally, or else I haven't yet done the same sequence of things I
did last time.  But since I have now lost data twice (more drastically
the first time when neither the original .sg file or the rescue file
would open), I think there is a definite problem.  

Note that with instructions from Ben Burton, I have already fixed the
python version in the postinst script, and I have deleted and htus
recreated my .scigraphica/config file, so the problem isn't wiht the
python version.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wurundjeri 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages scigraphica depends on:
ii  gdk-imlib1               1.9.14-11       imaging library for use with gtk (
ii  libc6                    2.3.1-3         GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2               1.2.10-6        The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                1.2.10-14       The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libgtkextra17            0.99.17-2       A useful set of widgets for GTK+
ii  libncurses5              5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libreadline4             4.3-4           GNU readline and history libraries
ii  libxml1                  1:1.8.17-2      GNOME XML library
ii  python-gtk               0.6.11-5        GTK support module for Python.
ii  python-numeric           22.0-3          Numerical (matrix-oriented) Mathem
ii  python2.2                2.2.2-1         An interactive object-oriented scr
ii  scigraphica-common       0.8.0-4.1       Scientific graphics and data manip
ii  xlibs                    4.2.1-3         X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                   1:1.1.4-6       compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8.0-10+rm

The scigraphica package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/438774 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Barry deFreese


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to