Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:53:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#310640: cl-asdf: cl-mcclim package made unusable by the
latest asdf package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 22:29:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 15:29:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DahuL-0006Gu-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 15:29:53 -0700
Received: from arcanes.caniart.net (aqu33-4-82-233-52-145.fbx.proxad.net
[82.233.52.145])
by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095E51734B3;
Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lymbes.caniart.net ([10.0.1.11])
by arcanes.caniart.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1DahuI-0003k3-B6; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:50 +0200
Received: from nicolas by lymbes.caniart.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dahto-0005Fu-4H; Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:20 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nicolas CANIART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 00:29:19 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.0.1.11
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cl-asdf: cl-mcclim package made unusable by the latest asdf package.
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on arcanes.caniart.net)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: cl-asdf
Version: 1.86-4
Severity: normal
The patch Peter Van Eynde applied on asdf.lisp in his latest release of
the asdf package rendered the mcclim package unusable.
(cf. cl-asdf_1.86-4.diff.gz on asdf qa page.)
There are two files named "package" in then scigraph defsystem. And
the recently applied patch causes an error to be raised in that case.
So mcclim is let partially loaded (only scigraph and the :mcclim package
def is missing).
The faulty file names are at lines 318, 328 in the mcclim.asd file.
The ennoying patch is at line 23 of the diff file and is inserted at
line 938 in the asdf.lisp file (from the cl-asdf package);
I quickly discuss the matter Milan Zamazal, the question is, is it really
necessary for file names to be unique ? I can't find documents about what may
(or may not) contain a defsystem.
If it is absolutely necessary, it will induce some change on the mcclim
package (and others ?), otherwise you should just remove the part of your
patch I previously mention.
Cordially,
Nicolas CANIART.
(I'm running a debian unstable with :
cl-mcclim 0.9.1-1
cl-asdf 1.86-4)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310640-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2005 12:53:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 05 05:53:40 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (blackbird.zamazal.org) [217.66.176.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DeudI-0008R9-00; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 05:53:40 -0700
Received: from pdm by blackbird.zamazal.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Deucm-0003mI-1M; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:53:08 +0200
To: Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#310640: cl-asdf: cl-mcclim package made unusable by the latest
asdf package
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Milan Zamazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 1:20:050605:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::x5ufmvYoEyNvDTxW:000000000000000000000000000000000000000CFxx
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050605:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::x5ufmvYoEyNvDTxW:000000000000000000000000000000000000000CFxx
X-Payment: hashcash 1.2 1:20:050605:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::dHH9S29xRyFtXw+R:00000000000000000000000000000000007Kud
X-Hashcash: 1:20:050605:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::dHH9S29xRyFtXw+R:00000000000000000000000000000000007Kud
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:53:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Peter Van Eynde's message of "Sat, 04 Jun
2005 23:58:01 +0200")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
>>>>> "PVE" == Peter Van Eynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PVE> ... It seems the problem is McClim (!)
Thanks for investigation, Peter. I agree with your analysis, so I'm
closing bug #310640 again and fix the issue in cl-mcclim some way.
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
--
I fear fear both faith and power
They have no need to use any question marks -- UJD
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
