Your message dated Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:56:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linda has been removed from Debian, closing #454078
has caused the Debian Bug report #454078,
regarding W: Long descriptions contains short description.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
454078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linda
Version: 0.3.26
Severity: minor
The word "description should be in the singular form in the warning
message "Long descriptions contains short description".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages linda depends on:
ii binutils 2.18.1~cvs20071027-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii dash 0.5.4-2 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii dpkg-dev 1.14.12 package building tools for Debian
ii file 4.21-3 Determines file type using "magic"
ii man-db 2.5.0-4 on-line manual pager
ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-support 0.7.5 automated rebuilding support for p
Versions of packages linda recommends:
ii debian-policy 3.7.2.2 Debian Policy Manual and related d
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.3.26+rm
The linda package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/469039 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
