Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 12:50:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line should not be orphaned/removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #474643,
regarding gtablix: should this package be orphaned or removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
474643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtablix
Version: 0.9.13-1-1
Severity: important
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-orphan
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that
should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because:
* Out of date
* Last maintainer upload 2006.
* Low popcon. (~30 installed).
If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being
orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so.
If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues.
Also, you can study the possibility of taking co-maintainers.
If you agree that it should be orphaned, send the following commands
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number):
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn wnpp
retitle nnnnnn O: <packagename> -- <short package description>
thanks
If you think it should be removed, send the following commands instead:
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
thanks
For more information, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
i do not think this one should be orphaned or removed:
- low popcon is no indication, it is a fairly special package
- it is usefull if you are working with tablix
- it has not seen much work upstream, which is a shame, but it is still
quite usefull
- i do agree that it should also see more work from my side ;)
cu robert
--
Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
