Your message dated Mon, 5 May 2008 12:56:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line linneighborhood has been removed from Debian, closing #151273
has caused the Debian Bug report #151273,
regarding linneighborhood: package name spelt wrong
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
151273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=151273
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linneighborhood
Version: 0.6.4-2
Severity: minor

You illiterate yanks just don't know how to spell Neighbourhood ;-)

Could you make an alias/virtual package for the spelling used by the
rest of the English speaking world?

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux hofmann 2.4.18sv-ipsec #1 Mon May 20 10:56:55 GMT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages linneighborhood depends on:
ii  gettext-base                  0.10.40-5  GNU Internationalization utilities
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.10-4   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.10-11  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  smbclient                     2.2.3a-6   A LanManager like simple client fo
ii  smbfs                         2.2.3a-6   mount and umount commands for the 
ii  xlibs                         4.1.0-16   X Window System client libraries



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.5-4+rm

The linneighborhood package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/466489 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to