Your message dated Mon, 05 May 2008 16:47:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#478643: independent checkbashisms package
has caused the Debian Bug report #478643,
regarding independent checkbashisms package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
478643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.10.26
Severity: wishlist
checkbashisms seems to be a highly useful script not specific to
Debian or Debian's packaging system. Consider moving it to an
independent package of its own.
(Indeed, one could say it belongs more to the bash package... but in
any case it should not be bundled along with something much bigger
there either.)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 20:34 +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> tag 478643 wontfix
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > checkbashisms seems to be a highly useful script not specific to
> > Debian or Debian's packaging system. Consider moving it to an
> > independent package of its own.
>
> Hi, thanks for reporting a bug against devscripts.
> However, I don't think checkbashisms, a 15K scripts, deserves its own
> package.
[...]
> Of course, other people in the team can untag the bug or even close the
> bug (that was my first reaction, actually).
Agreed; closing with this message.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
