Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:32:17 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#304251: mirrors: status.html busted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2005 22:12:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 11 15:12:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DL78g-0007X0-00; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:12:14 -0700
Received: from tc218-187-64-181.2-1.dynamic.apol.com.tw ([218.187.64.181]:35175 
helo=jidanni1)
        by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa 
        (Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50 #1)
        id 1DL78e-0002CP-7a by authid <jidanni> with plain
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:42:13 +0530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please
Subject: mirrors: status.html busted
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:08:24 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: mirrors
Severity: normal

$ lynx -dump http://mirror.debian.org/status.html

                 Debian Project Data capturing time window:
                        Mon Apr 11 02:04:04 2005 UTC
                       - Mon Apr 11 02:04:04 2005 UTC
            HTML-file creation time: Mon Apr 11 02:04:04 2005 UTC

                            Debian Mirror Checker

                          [1]main, [2]nonus, [3]www

Archive: main


Archive: nonus


Archive: www
... all empty.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304251-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 19:32:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 12:32:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.phonecoop.coop [82.138.229.72] 
        by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dfjoi-0007dK-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 12:32:52 -0700
Received: from [213.55.30.50] (helo=pipe.localnet)
        by mail.phonecoop.coop with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
        id 1DfjoC-0008S2-Gd; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:32:20 +0100
Received: from mjr by pipe.localnet with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Dfjo9-0006nl-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:32:17 +0100
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 07 Jun 2005 06:32:16 +0800 
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#304251: mirrors: status.html busted
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:32:17 +0100
X-Antivirus-Scanned: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Dan Jacobson wrote:
> MJ> http://mirror.debian.org/status.html looks fixed again to me now.
> MJ> How about you?
> Well, at least there should be a link at top, <a
> href="legend">Legend</a>, to the <a name="legend">Legend</a> below!

There's several improvements (and should use id and xhtml rather
than name-d a tags now) possible, but that's a different, wishlist
bug to this one, IMO.

Seeing as you seem to have looked at the page and not mentioned
the problem still exists, I'll assume this is fixed now.

Thanks for your bug report. Sorry it took a while to reply.

-- 
MJ Ray (slef), K. Lynn, England, email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to