Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2008 15:02:59 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#480354: sendfile support missing in aufs
has caused the Debian Bug report #480354,
regarding sendfile support missing in aufs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
480354: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480354
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-amd64
Severity: important
aufs no longer has the sendfile capability, which seems to be
because the kernel is missing a patch, that is needed for 2.6.23+ kernels.
(
http://aufs.cvs.sourceforge.net/aufs/aufs/patch/splice-2.6.23.patch?view=markup
)
The function returns with 'Invalid argument' if I try to use it
on an aufs filesystem. The last working kernel is 2.6.22-3.
Tests were made with lighttpd and a small test program (attached).
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
/*
* SENDFILE TEST
*
* mkdir -p /tmp/aufs /tmp/aufs1; echo "test" > /tmp/aufs1/test.txt; mount -t aufs none /tmp/aufs -o rw,br:/tmp/aufs1
*
* ./sendfile-test2 /tmp/aufs/test.txt
*
*/
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/sendfile.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int port = 54321, sock_srv, sock_clnt, fd, addrlen;
struct sockaddr_in addr; off_t offset = 0;
char buf[1];
if (argc!=2) { printf("Usage: %s <file-on-aufs>\n", argv[0]); }
if ( (sock_srv = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) == -1) { fprintf(stderr, "server socket error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
memset(&addr, 0, sizeof(addr)); addr.sin_family = AF_INET; addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1"); addr.sin_port = htons(port);
if ( bind(sock_srv, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) == -1 ) { fprintf(stderr, "server bind error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
if ( (sock_clnt = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) == -1) { fprintf(stderr, "client socket error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
if ( connect(sock_clnt, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)) == -1 ) { fprintf(stderr, "client connect error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
if ( (fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)) == -1) { fprintf(stderr, "open error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
offset = 0;
if ( sendfile (sock_clnt, fd, &offset, 1) == -1) { fprintf(stderr, "sendfile error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
if ( read(sock_srv, buf, 1) < 1 ) { fprintf(stderr, "read error: %s\n", strerror(errno)); exit(1); }
printf("sendfile seems OK!\n");
close(fd); close(sock_srv); close(sock_clnt); return 0;
}
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
You already reported this bug as Bug#473430, which has been fixed in aufs
0+20080401-1.
Reporting a bug two times is no good idea, especially since this has been fixed
already. I have tested it my self and everything worked, using a aufs module
compiled by m-a.
The pre-compiled modules should now be fixed, too.
--
Julian Andres Klode, Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
Debian Maintainer | Developer | Ubuntu Member
try Debian: http://www.debian.org/ | my site: http://jak-linux.org/
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | IRC: juliank (FreeNode, OFTC)
languages: German | English
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
