Your message dated Fri, 23 May 2008 17:41:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cfe has been removed from Debian, closing #240312
has caused the Debian Bug report #240312,
regarding cfe: Unclear manpage description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
240312: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=240312
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: cfe
Version: 0.9-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
The cfe(1) manpage is opaque a bit for a person that haven't used cfe(1)
before. This proposed patch would have solved this, for me:
- --- - Fri Mar 26 19:14:33 2004
+++ /tmp/cfe1.gz.23313 Fri Mar 26 19:14:33 2004
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
.I cfe
automatically supports loading of .psf and raw binary fonts.
Other types of fonts can be opened using the proper options.
+.I cfe
+can edit up to 2 files in parallel (file1 & file2 in the SYNOPSIS above). The
+files are edited in-place.
.SH OPTIONS
.TP
.B -a
Both additions are important: (1) That cfe in fact can edit 2 files, and
no more than 2 files, simultaneously, and (2) that it edits them
in-place, as any self-respecting UN*X editor would (and as some Debian
font-editing utilities don't, AFAICT).
Cheers,
Jan.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAZHSj+uczK20Fa5cRApXYAKCrUt0dv9tTgYHsCUd23AN5BFTsdwCfYFhe
LKLPfs/4bCG6atJY6/4c7og=
=Ods/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9-8+rm
The cfe package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/328801 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
