Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:46:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Sarge is released
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 May 2005 11:28:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 24 04:28:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host217-34-213-194.in-addr.btopenworld.com (cobra.dev.ipcc.tv)
[217.34.213.194]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DaXaY-0006Yc-00; Tue, 24 May 2005 04:28:46 -0700
Received: (qmail 4184 invoked by uid 1000); 24 May 2005 11:28:14 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-cacher: leaves many processes behind
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:28:13 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt-cacher
Version: 0.8.6
Severity: important
Tags: sarge
apt-cacher leaves many processes lying around after all clients
disconnected. Here is a ps output:
cobra:~# ps -f -C apt-cacher.pl -C wget
UID PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
www-data 3751 1 0 11:09 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3752 3751 0 11:09 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3760 1 0 11:12 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3761 3760 0 11:12 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3782 1 0 11:36 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3783 3782 0 11:36 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3803 1 0 11:42 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3804 3803 0 11:42 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3871 1 0 11:50 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3872 3871 0 11:50 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3885 1 0 11:51 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3886 3885 0 11:51 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3894 1 0 11:53 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3895 3894 0 11:53 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3911 1 0 11:55 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3912 3911 0 11:55 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 3924 1 0 11:57 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 3925 3924 0 11:57 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 4026 1 0 11:59 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 4027 4026 0 11:59 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 4062 1 0 12:03 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 4063 4062 0 12:03 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
www-data 4067 1 0 12:05 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/perl
/usr/share/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.pl
www-data 4068 4067 0 12:05 ? 00:00:00 [wget] <defunct>
With debug=1 in /etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf, for every second, there
is one line "read 0 bytes" in the log file, until there is a line "abort
(timeout)". However, the apt-cacher.pl process appear not to exit
during the time for this bug report.
I do not know whether these processes will die in the near future. If
they do not die, apt-cacher will use all the memory (and other resources)
of the system. So this bug might be release critical.
I do not see this happening on unstable, hence the sarge tag.
Regards,
Qingning
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages apt-cacher depends on:
ii apache2 2.0.54-4 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii apache2-mpm-worker [apache2] 2.0.54-4 high speed threaded model for Apac
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii wget 1.9.1-11 retrieves files from the web
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 310566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 07:46:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 11 00:46:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dh0gu-0001zD-00; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 00:46:04 -0700
Received: from debian.localnet (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5B7k2nt006631
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:46:02 +0200
Received: from inet by debian.localnet with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dh0gr-0004rG-PM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:46:01 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:46:01 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sarge is released
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Hello,
Saarge is released with the new version of apt-cacher. I am closing the
report.
--
<Acrimon> hmm. versteht "man iptables" unter "interface" eine IP-Adresse?
<weasel> nein, ein interface
<Acrimon> ah ok
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
