Your message dated Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:28:15 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line smlnj 110.67-2 has been uploaded and built for amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #483599,
regarding smlnj: new upstream release (110.67)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
483599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=483599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: smlnj
Version: 110.65-1
Severity: wishlist
Source can be found here: http://www.smlnj.org/dist/working/110.67/index.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages smlnj depends on:
ii smlnj-runtime 110.65-1 Standard ML of New Jersey runtime
Versions of packages smlnj recommends:
ii libsmlnj-smlnj 110.65-1 Useful libraries for Standard ML o
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 110.67-2
Now that 110.67-1 has passed NEW I can close these bugs. Since
nobody's complained to me that the amd64 binary is horribly broken
(yet) I'll assume that it's ok, too.
--- End Message ---
