Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 08:11:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 01:11:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhNZ8-0002JL-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:11:34 -0700
Received: from [192.168.10.101] (janjaap.xs4all.nl [213.84.218.16])
by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5C8BXkL089722
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:15:32 +0200
From: Jan-Jaap Fahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: netinstall for sarge points to testing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt-get
Version: 0.5.28.6
Severity: serious
Discovered when doing a fresh install:
When installing sarge using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso, the sources.list
for apt is set up to point to
'testing' instead of 'stable' or 'sarge'. This means that using the
netsetup for sarge, you still get an
RC3 installation. Manual correction of sources.list is required to fix this.
This could be an error in base-config or in apt-get, but for all
practical purposes it breaks apt.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 313150-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 23:01:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 12 16:01:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DhbSe-0001fv-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:49 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 22274171E36; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:01:48 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jan-Jaap Fahner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#313150: netinstall for sarge points to testing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 01:43:34PM +0200, Jan-Jaap Fahner wrote:
> I just checked. It says: Debian GNU/Linux testing "Sarge" - Official=20
> Snapshot i386 Binary-1 (20050322)
> which means it *should* point to testing.
> I downloaded it from http://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/ though, after the=
=20
> final release, and the page at that
> time already said 'stable'. The filename was changed, too. I'm=20
> reasonably sure that the rc3 netinst wasn't
> called sarge-i386-netinst.iso.
> I've just downloaded the most current version, which, incidentally, has=
=20
> a different name once again
> (debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso). That one is fine, and points to stable,=
=20
> so I suppose this bug should
> be closed. There's probably no point in investigating any further.
Ok, closing the bug. Thanks for the follow-up.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCrL7aKN6ufymYLloRAlUrAKCSwissBj9vWS6pH30gNbNv9ysrHQCeM1m1
BPgcmAiCGrFQW15rCui4AjQ=
=hXnW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Clx92ZfkiYIKRjnr--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
