Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2004 08:28:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 16 00:28:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ulm.bund.de [194.95.179.208]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B39w9-0008JP-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:28:33 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by Ulm.bund.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) id JAA23073
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:27:52 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debhelper: dh_install --list-missing does not work for multi-binary
packages
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 09:27:33 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2004 08:27:34.0565 (UTC)
FILETIME=[88431550:01C40B30]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
Package: debhelper
Version: 4.2.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
at first I noticed that dh_install --list-missing needs a directory debian/tmp
to work correctly. This should be created if it does not exist. But this
is might be a cosmetic change - if it is connected to the problem below than
we have to face a documentation bug.
Moreover if I use the --list-missing option on a multi-binary package I get
a really huge list of files which dh_install claims to be not installed but
in fact they are in different target packages.
Feel free to ask for an example of my packaging stuff to verify the problem.
Kind regards and thanks for this very useful package
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (499, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Versions of packages debhelper depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.7-5 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.0.91-2 The GNU core utilities
ii debconf-utils 1.4.11 debconf utilities
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.18.1 Package building tools for Debian
ii file 4.07-2 Determines file type using "magic"
ii fileutils 5.0.91-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii html2text 1.3.2a-1 An advanced HTML to text converter
ii perl 5.8.3-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii po-debconf 0.8.8 Manage translated Debconf template
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 238274-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2005 15:47:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 13 08:47:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dhr9p-0004SM-00; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:47:25 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3FB17DC5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:47:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EB8A96E085; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:47:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:47:18 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Closing this bug as probably user error.
--=20
see shy jo
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCraqGd8HHehbQuO8RAi4MAJwPMWNI/xAdvkftncaOI/ykoUoBUgCgz3UO
F74++NI6+FDz22xEhX+yqjM=
=HMBo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
