Your message dated Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:03:13 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line THESE BUGS *WERE* CLOSED YEARS AGO IN NMUS, DO ***NOT***
RE-OPEN THEM
has caused the Debian Bug report #101426,
regarding Could dlocate work with slocate?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
101426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=101426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dlocate
Version: 0.5
Severity: wishlist
Hey there :) Wishlist bug; sent only to you. Anyways, I was wondering if
there was any particular reason dlocate couldn't work with slocate? I don't
now much about either of them. If you are pretty sure that there's no reason
why it couldn't work, I'll port it for you.
Thanks for the nifty tool :)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux david 2.4.6-pre2-xfs-a1 #4 Sun Jun 10 23:21:57 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages dlocate depends on:
ii bash 2.05-4 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii findutils 4.1.7-2 utilities for finding files--find,
ii grep-dctrl 1.7 Grep Debian package information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
THESE BUGS *WERE* CLOSED YEARS AGO IN NMUS, DO ***NOT*** RE-OPEN THEM
craig
--
craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- End Message ---
