Your message dated Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:18:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#314406: FTBFS: not compatible with dpkg-dev 1.13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 02:27:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 19:27:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dik6i-0008OA-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:27:52 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j5G2Ro0K093505
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DicLY-0004Q2-Mv
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:10:40 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: not compatible with dpkg-dev 1.13
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:10:40 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: zlib
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
zlib does not build with dpkg-dev 1.13 and later versions:
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -O3 -g -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DNO_snprintf -DHAS_sprintf_void
-DNO_ERRNO_H -c -o example.o example.c
make[1]: i486-linux-gnu-gcc: Command not found
make[1]: *** [example.o] Error 127
This appears to be due to the dpkg-architecture changes detailed at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 314406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2005 11:18:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 16 04:18:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk [80.71.3.114]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DisOd-0002v0-00; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:18:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CB779F8B;
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:18:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (kerouac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13788-01; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:18:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 10003)
id 20C9D79F8A; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:18:53 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:18:53 +0100
From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#314406: FTBFS: not compatible with dpkg-dev 1.13
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Cookie: No one gets sick on Wednesdays.
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at projectcolo.org.uk
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:00:57PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This is still probably a bug in zlib; packages that call gcc in this manner
> usually do so because they're invoking ./configure in such a way that
> autoconf thinks that the package is being cross-compiled.
zlib doesn't use autoconf.
It is doing this because of the cross compilation support, but that's
because all the package is doing is running the GCC variant for whatever
dpkg-dev claims is the target architecture without looking to work out
if that's different to the build architecture.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
